Meta’s Free-Speech Shift Made It Clear to Advertisers: ‘Brand Safety’ Is Out of Vogue - WSJ

Exclusive | Meta’s Free-Speech Shift Made It Clear to Advertisers: ‘Brand Safety’ Is Out of Vogue - WSJ:

Brand safety “has become politicized and it was never motivated by politics,” said Brad Jakeman, a former marketer at PepsiCo. The movement around brand safety happened because “we heard from our consumers that they felt uncomfortable with our brands being connected to content that they found offensive,” he said.

In December, just days after advertising giant Omnicom agreed to acquire Interpublic, Jordan launched a probe into the merger, seeking information on the companies’ ties to the trade group that Musk sued. Among the requests made in Jordan’s letter to Omnicom’s CEO: “all documents and communications related to so-called ‘brand safety.’” Ad executives say they are wary of putting a target on their backs by speaking up about brand safety, and some agencies are now reluctant to send clients “point-of-view” memos on the topic when online controversies arise.

(My emphasis). This is the chilling effect of Trumpism, which extends a long way beyond his executive power. It’s the ability to make people and companies believe that it’s simply not worth the hassle to go up against them, to rely on the expense and inconvenience of doing anything which may be percieved as not being in line with them. In the end, people will censor themselves.


Congress finds Trump's TikTok sale scheme confusing, possibly illegal - Live Updates - POLITICO

Congress finds Trump's TikTok sale scheme confusing, possibly illegal - Live Updates - POLITICO:

Members of Congress are declaring themselves bewildered by Donald Trump’s latest proposal to save TikTok by brokering a joint-ownership deal.

“I don’t know what he means by that," said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), of Trump’s suggestion to broker a “joint venture” in which “the U.S. should be entitled to get half of TikTok.”

“I don’t understand what the president is doing,” said Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

One thing that is worth remembering about Trump: his entire career has been built on the principle of making it costly to oppose him, often by tying up his “enemies” in court. Opposing him then become so costly in time and money that it’s not worth the effort. Will this also work on Congress? I think we’re about to find out.