links for 2008-01-18
-
George Ou points out that "HD" download services from Apple and Microsoft are nothing of the sort, delivering quality that's actually below DVD. He's not wrong.
« Uh huh, right, so there's no Mac malware... | Main | Daring Fireball on commercial malware vs commercial non-malware »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e366353ef00e54ff94ef48834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference links for 2008-01-18:
Dan Roam: Back of the Napkin, The: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures
Mary Jo Foley: Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft Plans to Stay Relevant in the Post-gates Era
Susan Greenfield: ID: The Quest for Identity in the 21st Century
Ah yes, but we've been here before (more than once). Remember RealAudio v2.0 being referred to as "(near) FM quality"? - that was when it was "jumping" from 12Kbps to 20Kbps...
HD is the new emperor's new marketing format.
I'm amazed if anyone even understands the TV's, never mind the downloads.
And actually "HD" currently goes all the way up to 880Mbps (HDCAM SR) and I know a fair number of production-end people working the D5 format (323Mbps).
Following Moore's utilisation corollary - we'll always fill our hard drives, even if they contain more atoms than the known universe.
Ultimately, most consumers simply don't care for most content-types - it's access they want.
Posted by: Gavin | January 18, 2008 at 11:49 PM
It's very true that access is important, but I think with video people are more likely to be able to spot the difference than with audio. Certainly, watching "Blade Runner" on Blu-Ray was a revelation for me, compared to DVD.
Posted by: Ian Betteridge | January 19, 2008 at 09:39 AM